USPTO serial 76688551
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
East Hampton, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myron Amer
350 National BlvdSuite 2BLong Beach, NY 11561-3327| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Fitness exercise and instruction, not including fitness testing or assessment in a health club | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |