USPTO serial 76688752
SUPREME MACKEREL BRAND IN TOMATO SAUCE IN TOMATO SAUCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3678165Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 8, 2009
- Examiner
- HODGES, KOURTNEE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPREME MACKEREL BRAND IN TOMATO SAUCE IN TOMATO SAUCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JungJin Lee
DENNIS KINI KONUWA232 MILLER STREETNEWARK, NJ 07114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed fish, namely, canned mackerel | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Nov 7, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KONUWA, DENNIS KINI
- Other trademarks owned by KONUWA, DENNIS KINI
- Other trademarks owned by KONUWA, DENNIS KINI
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named SUPREME MACKEREL BRAND IN TOMATO SAUCE IN TOMATO SAUCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2018 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 13, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |