USPTO serial 76688768
EXPERIENCE 4 HIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPERIENCE 4 HIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harry M. Thomson, Jr.
5027 HARTWELL DRHOUSTON, TX 77084-2367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | employment services and a business application process offered through an online internet-based system, namely, an on-line internet database in the field of personnel placement, management, and recruitment featuring an inventory of professional and technical employee skills and experience enabling client organizations to allow contractor reclassification and achieve cost-effective recruitment of consultants who receive tax-advantaged financial and payroll support services associated with their respective client engagements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTHSTAR HOLDINGS (CAYMAN), INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTHSTAR HOLDINGS (CAYMAN), INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named EXPERIENCE 4 HIRE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2010 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |