USPTO serial 76688967
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark P. Kovalchuk
MARK P. KOVALCHUK KOVALCHUK LAW OFFICES, P.A.PO BOX 32371MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55432-0371UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Distributorships in the field of paper clothing patterns for home sewing and sewing instruction books for home sewing | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1968 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |