USPTO serial 76689054
PHOTOMED TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHOTOMED TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Benjamin Borson, Ph.D.
D. BENJAMIN BORSON, PH.D. Borson Law Group, PC1320 Willow Pass Road, Suite 490Concord, CA 94520-5232UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LAMPS FOR USING ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION FOR TREATING DISORDERS; LAMPS AND EQUIPMENT CONTAINING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPONENT OPERATING SOFTWARE THEREFOR FOR USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH LAMPS FOR USING ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION FOR SCIENTIFIC OR MEDICAL RESEARCH | ACTIVE | Apr 17, 2007 |
| 010 | MEDICAL EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, LAMPS FOR USING ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION FOR TREATING DISORDERS OF NERVES, BLOOD VESSELS OR MUSCLES; LAMPS AND EQUIPMENT CONTAINING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPONENT OPERATING SOFTWARE THEREFOR SOLD AS A UNIT FOR USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH LAMPS FOR USING ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION FOR TREATING DISORDERS OF NERVES, BLOOD VESSELS OR MUSCLES | ACTIVE | Apr 17, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |