USPTO serial 76689261
CITRÓNGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3713485Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 17, 2009
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CITRÓNGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Caribbean Distillers Corporation, Limited
Sandy Ground, British West Indies, AI
Other trademarks owned by Caribbean Distillers Corporation, Limited
PATRON SPIRITS INTERNATIONAL AG
SCHAFFHAUSEN, CH
PATRON SPIRITS INTERNATIONAL AG
SCHAFFHAUSEN, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bernard R. Gans
BERNARD R GANS JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MARMARO LLP1900 AVENUE OF THE STARS7TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90067-5010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages except beers; liqueurs | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Caribbean Distillers Corporation, Limited
- Other trademarks owned by PATRON SPIRITS INTERNATIONAL AG
- Other trademarks owned by PATRON SPIRITS INTERNATIONAL AG
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named CITRÓNGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2010 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |