USPTO serial 76689334
INTEGRAMPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3730302Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 29, 2009
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTEGRAMPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Worcestershire, WR14 3PS, GB
Worcestershire, WR14 3PS, GB
Worcestershire, WR14 3PS, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley C. Spooner
STANLEY C. SPOONER Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.901 North Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203-1808UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL CONSULTING, RESEARCH AND DESIGN SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER AND ELECTRONIC MICROSYSTEMS, MICRO AND NANOTECHNOLOGIES, INTEGRATION OF FLUIDIC, OPTICAL, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC, SENSORY AND BIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS IN MICROSYSTEMS, MINIATURIZATION OF ELECTRONICS, OPTO-ELECTRONICS, COMPUTERS AND SENSORS, COMPOUND SEMI-CONDUCTOR DEVICES, SENSORS, OPTO-ELECTRONIC AND MICRO-FLUIDIC INSTRUMENTATION, AND MICRO-ENGINEERING OF POLYMER MATERIALS; INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH SERVICES, NAMELY, SIMULATION OF, DEVELOPMENT OF, PROTOTYPING OF, CONDUCTING FEASIBILITY STUDIES OF, DESIGN OF, AND MODELING OF COMPUTER AND ELECTRONIC MICROSYSTEMS, POLYMER MATERIALS, MICRO AND NANOTECHNOLOGIES, MINIATURIZATION OF ELECTRONICS, OPTOELECTRONICS, COMPUTERS, FLUIDIC INSTRUMENTATION AND SENSORS, COMPOUND SEMI-CONDUCTOR DEVICES, SENSORS, AND OPTO-ELECTRONIC AND MICRO-FLUIDIC INSTRUMENTATION, AND MICRO-ENGINEERING OF POLYMER MATERIALS; SCIENTIFIC DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT, NAMELY, DEVICE/COMPONENT SIMULATION AND MODELING OF AND PROTOTYPING AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER AND ELECTRONIC MICROSYSTEMS, POLYMER MATERIALS, PROTOTYPES, MICRO AND NANOTECHNOLOGIES, COMPOUND SEMI-CONDUCTOR DEVICES, SENSORS, AND OPTO-ELECTRONIC AND MICRO-FLUIDIC INSTRUMENTATION; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES; ALL ESPECIALLY IN RELATION TO MICRO AND NANO SCALE TECHNOLOGY AND MICRO-ELECTRO-MECHANICAL-SYSTEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |