USPTO serial 76689458
Q
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Q?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter D. Murray
Peter D. Murray Cooper & Dunham LLP30 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE, COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING DOCUMENTS, NAMELY, THE TRANSFERRING, STORING, FILING, CATEGORIZING AND PRINTING OF DOCUMENTS, NAMELY, TEXT OR IMAGE DATA; NETWORK SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING AND MAINTAINING THE OPERATION OF A COMPUTER NETWORK, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR TRANSMITTING DOCUMENTS, NAMELY, TEXT OR IMAGE DATA | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED DATABASE AND DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | SERVICES PROVIDING ELECTRONIC STORAGE OF FILES AND DOCUMENTS, NAMELY, TEXT OR IMAGE DATA | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | SERVICES PROVIDING PHOTOGRAPHIC ENLARGING VIA THE INTERNET; SERVICES PROVIDING PRINTING VIA THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | SERVICES PROVIDING DIGITAL IMAGING VIA THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ricoh Company, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Ricoh Company, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named Q
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |