Drawing for MINI WORKS

USPTO serial 76689554

MINI WORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINI WORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David G. Bray

DAVID G. BRAY MARISCAL, WEEKS, McINTYRE & FRIEDLANDER2901 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUESUITE 200PHOENIX, AZ 85012-2705

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SHIRTS, SHORTS, BOXER SHORTS, SWEATSHIRTS, TANK TOPS, COATS, JACKETS, PULLOVERS, SWEATERS, PANTS, SWEAT PANTS AND TOPS, CAPS, VISORS AND BASEBALL HATSACTIVEJun 30, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2013MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 4, 2013ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 3, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 9, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 17, 2012LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
May 11, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 15, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 14, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 14, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 13, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 11, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 11, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 11, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 11, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 5, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance