USPTO serial 76689692
EPIONCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3659690Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 28, 2009
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPIONCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Haenel
9450 RIVERSIDE DRBOISE, ID 83714-6702UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Topically applied cosmetics, namely, skin creams, lotions, powders and gels | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Oct 12, 2002 |
| 005 | Topically applied neutraceuticals and dermatologicals, namely, creams, lotions, oils, and gels for the treatment of skin conditions | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Oct 12, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Episciences, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Episciences, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Episciences, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named EPIONCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2011 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| May 7, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 12, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |