USPTO serial 76689710
A NATURAL PARTNERSHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A NATURAL PARTNERSHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHELDON S. LAZAROVITZ
31 WESTGATE BLVD.TORONTO, ONTARIO, M3H 1N8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beverages, namely, fruit juices and fruit drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |