USPTO serial 76689770
LEAVING IT BEHIND WAS NEVER SO ELEGANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEAVING IT BEHIND WAS NEVER SO ELEGANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Sutton
JOSEPH SUTTON Law Offices of Ezra Sutton, P.A.900 Route 9, Suite 201Plaza 9 BuildingWoodbridge, NJ 07095Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Plastic food containers of all kinds, namely, serving trays, platters, plastic eating plates, bowls, and lids related thereto, sold as a unit for food service; plastic serving utensils, namely, serving forks; serving spoons and serving tongs; cups, spreaders, namely, spatulas and ice buckets | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale distributorship services featuring cutlery, namely, forks, spoons and knives, plastic food containers of all kinds, namely, serving trays, platters, plastic eating plates, bowls, and lids related thereto, sold as a unit for food service, plastic serving utensils, namely, serving forks, serving spoons and serving tongs, cups, spreaders, namely, spatulas and ice buckets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SABERT CORPORATION.
- Other trademarks owned by SABERT CORPORATION.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named LEAVING IT BEHIND WAS NEVER SO ELEGANT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |