USPTO serial 76689853
BLUE HARMONY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLUE HARMONY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kariya-city, Aichi-pref. 448-8661, JP
Kariya-city, Aichi-pref. 448-8661, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. Keith Miller
H. KEITH MILLER Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.PO BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303-0828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical and optical cables; electrical wires; cash registers; electronic plotters; switchboards; electronic switches; magnetic switches; cell switches; change-over switches; cut-out switches; differential switches; electric current switches; electric flasher switches; high frequency switches; light switches; local switches; power switches; transistors; electric switches; vehicle head lights controller | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and repair of computer hardware of computer and computer networks; telephone apparatus installation and repair | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, cellular telephone communication, communications by computer terminals, communication by telephone, facsimile transmission, electronic mail, paging services, electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; providing information about telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer diagnostic services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DENSO CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DENSO CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BLUE HARMONY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |