USPTO serial 76689883
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary L. Shaffer
901 BANKS PLALEXANDRIA, VA 22312-5507UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE, NAMELY, FIBER-OPTIC TRANSCEIVERS, FIBER OPTIC REPEATERS, CONVERTERS AND OPTIMIZERS, WAVE DIVISION MULTIPLEXERS, FREE-SPACE OPTICS TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, SWITCHES INCLUDING ETHERNET SWITCHES AND ROUTERS, FIBER-TO-THE-HOME AND ETHERNET-OVER-VDSL ACCESS AGGREGATORS, TERMINATORS AND REPEATERS, AND REMOTE PRESENCE MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SWITCHES, AND CONSOLE, ALARM, SENSOR AND POWER MANAGEMENT DEVICES; FREE-SPACE OPTICS TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, ETHERNET SWITCHES AND ROUTERS, AND SOFTWARE SOLD BOTH AS COMPONENTS THEREOF AND SEPARATELY, INCLUDING SOFTWARE ADAPTED AND ARRANGED FOR OPERATING, INSTALLING, TESTING, DIAGNOSING AND MANAGING THE FORGOING TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT; ALL FOR USE IN PROVIDING SERVICES AND MANAGEMENT WITH RESPECT TO COMMUNICATIONS AND NET-WORKING EQUIPMENT IN THE FIBER-OPTIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |