USPTO serial 76689884
E-PAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-PAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary L. Shaffer
GARY L. SHAFFER GARY L. SHAFFER, ESQ., LLC901 BANKS PLACEALEXANDRIA, VA 22312UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE, NAMELY, FIBER-OPTIC TRANSCEIVERS, FIBER OPTIC REPEATERS, CONVERTERS AND OPTIMIZERS, WAVE DIVISION MULTIPLEXERS, FREE-SPACE OPTICS TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, SWITCHES INCLUDING ETHERNET SWITCHES AND ROUTERS, FIBER-TO-THE-HOME AND ETHERNET-OVER-VDSL ACCESS AGGREGATORS, TERMINATORS AND REPEATERS, AND REMOTE PRESENCE MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SWITCHES, AND CONSOLE, ALARM, SENSOR AND POWER MANAGEMENT DEVICES; FREE-SPACE OPTICS TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, ETHERNET SWITCHES AND ROUTERS, AND SOFTWARE SOLD BOTH AS COMPONENTS THEREOF AND SEPARATELY, NAMELY, SOFTWARE ADAPTED AND ARRANGED FOR OPERATING, INSTALLING, TESTING, DIAGNOSING AND MANAGING THE FORGOING TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT; ALL FOR USE IN PROVIDING SERVICES AND MANAGEMENT WITH RESPECT TO COMMUNICATIONS AND NET-WORKING EQUIPMENT IN THE FIBER-OPTIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 27, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 1, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |