USPTO serial 76689939
GREASEPAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREASEPAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hoboken, NJ
Hoboken, NJ
Daytona Beach, FL
Daytona Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip M. Weiss
Philip M. Weiss WEISS & WEISS410 Jericho TurnpikeSTE 105Jericho, NY 11753Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Aluminum garbage bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VALENTI, DEBRA S.
- Other trademarks owned by VALENTI, DEBRA S.
- Other trademarks owned by RIEHL, RICHARD DOUGLAS
- Other trademarks owned by RIEHL, RICHARD DOUGLAS
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named GREASEPAX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2011 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | PBIR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | PBIR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |