USPTO serial 76689996
VISCOSONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3715605Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 24, 2009
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VISCOSONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SPERIAN HEARING PROTECTION, LLC
San Diego, CA
SPERIAN HEARING PROTECTION, LLC
San Diego, CA
SPERIAN HEARING PROTECTION, LLC
San Diego, CA
HONEYWELL SAFETY PRODUCTS USA, INC.
SMITHFIELD, RI
Other trademarks owned by HONEYWELL SAFETY PRODUCTS USA, INC.
SPERIAN PROTECTION AMERICAS, INC.
SMITHFIELD, RI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Cohen
HONEYWELL SAFETY PRODUCTS USA, INC.900 DOUGLAS PIKESMITHFIELD, RI 02917UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Noise blocking devices that block environmental noise from a person's ear canals, namely, noise blocking devices that block all sounds, and noise blocking devices that pass only selected sound, namely, earbuds, earplugs, and ear cushions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SPERIAN HEARING PROTECTION, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SPERIAN HEARING PROTECTION, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SPERIAN HEARING PROTECTION, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HONEYWELL SAFETY PRODUCTS USA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SPERIAN PROTECTION AMERICAS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VISCOSONIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |