USPTO serial 76690276
EPS 7630
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 28, 2012
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with EPS 7630?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG
D-76227 Karlsruhe, DE
Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG
D-76227 Karlsruhe, DE
Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG
Karlsruhe, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathaniel Kramer
Nathaniel Kramer Kirschstein Israel Schiffmiller & Pieroni66 Palmer AvenueBronxville, NY 10708UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | plant-based pharmaceuticals for the treatment of respiratory diseases, namely, those based on an ethanolic extract of the roots of pelargonium sidoides | ACTIVE | Aug 24, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named EPS 7630
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2023 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 7, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 7, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 21, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 21, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 7, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |