USPTO serial 76690286
MULTIFUEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MULTIFUEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-38436 Wolfsburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barth X. deRosa
Barth X. deRosa Dickinson Wright PLLC1875 Eye Street NWSuite 1200Washington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, namely, drill presses, machining centers, cutting machines, spray guns for painting, degreasers for use in the field of automobile dismantling; machine tools, namely, electric hand held drills, derricks, cranes; motors, other than for land vehicles; motor parts for motors of all kinds other than for land vehicles, namely, motor starters, machine cylinders, machine cylinder heads, machine pumps, camshafts, pistons, fly wheels, bearings, valves, exhausts for engines, injectors for engines, carburetors for engines filters for cleaning cooling air, glow plugs for diesel engines, engine blocks, intake and exhaust manifolds, camshafts, cylinders; machine coupling and transmission components, namely, clutches other than for land vehicles shaft couplings not for land vehicles; jacks, namely, hydraulic jacks; agricultural implements other than hand-operated, namely, mechanized livestock feeders, power operated agricultural implements for attachments to tractors and harvesters; lawn mowers | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Automobiles, trucks, vans, sport utility vehicles, lorries, trailers, busses, trains, locomotives, bicycles, tricycles, motorcycles, snowmobiles, airplanes, boats and ships, hot air balloons and dirigibles, camping trailers, folding and hard side truck camping trailers, motor homes, conversion vans, travel trailers, camper coaches and structural parts for all of the aforesaid goods, complete engines for land vehicles and structural parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Reconstruction in the nature of custom rebuilding, repair, servicing, dismantling, cleaning, maintenance and varnishing of vehicles and their parts and motors and their parts, vehicle repair in the course of vehicle breakdown services; refinement and tuning of automobiles, and customization of automobiles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |