USPTO serial 76690299
BANDA PELILLOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4175803Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2012
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BANDA PELILLOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jesus Eduardo Arias, Esq. LL.M.
Jesus Eduardo Arias, Esq. LL.M. Law Offices of Jesus Eduardo Arias3500 West Beverly Blvd.Montebello, CA 90640Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, LIVE PERFORMANCES BY A MUSICAL BAND | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 2, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 17, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2012 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2011 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | PGRN | PETITION GRANTED - ISSUE NEW NOA | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |