Drawing for THE HEALTH CENTRE

USPTO serial 76690556

THE HEALTH CENTRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LIWINSKI, HELENE AGNES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE HEALTH CENTRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stanley B. Kita

STANLEY B KITA HOWSON & HOWSON LLP501 OFFICE CENTER DRSUITE 210FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034-3224

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring natural food supplements, vitamins and mineralsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 21, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 21, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 3, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 15, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 14, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 21, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 21, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 3, 2010CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED—
Feb 3, 2010CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED—
Feb 2, 2010CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jan 14, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 12, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 19, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 19, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 20, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 20, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance