USPTO serial 76690586
TEBUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEBUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Imitation jewelry and genuine jewelry; cufflinks; tie pins; jewelry, namely, collar bars; tie bars; brooches; pendants; pins; key holders of precious metal; jewelry for the head, namely, diadems; medallions; clocks; watch straps; watch dials and parts of watches; buckles for watchstraps; chronometric instruments and necktie pins; watches; precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith in the nature of jewelry; jewelry; horological instruments of precious metal; jewelry, namely, earrings; bracelets; necklaces; rings; watch movements; pocket watches; parts of watches, namely, watch winding buttons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |