Drawing for MOLASSES REEF

USPTO serial 76690625

MOLASSES REEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOLASSES REEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer S. Sickler

JENNIFER S. SICKLER GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1000 LOUISIANA ST STE 3400HOUSTON, TX 77002-5011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Real estate services, namely, services relating to the leasing, management and rental of apartments, flats, condominiums, time-sharing properties and residential real estateACTIVE—
037Real estate developmentACTIVE—
039Marina services, namely, operation of marina, providing dockage, storage and launch ramp facilitiesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing physical fitness consultation services; providing golf and tennis facilitiesACTIVE—
043Hotel services; restaurant, catering, bar and cocktail lounge services; provision of conference, exhibition and meeting facilities; providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions; making hotel reservations for othersACTIVE—
044Health spa services, namely, cosmetic body care services, namely, baths and spa treatment, including massage therapy services, aromatherapy, manicures, pedicures, facial and body wrap treatmentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 17, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 24, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance