USPTO serial 76690703
SUNTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUNTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Ryan
William J. Ryan Dunlap & Seeger, P.A.PO Box 549Rochester, MN 55903-0549UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CONSUMER ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS, NAMELY, TELEVISIONS, TELEVISION CONVERTERS AND DVD PLAYERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 30, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 30, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |