USPTO serial 76690759
DRAGONS VS ROBOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRAGONS VS ROBOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MASSIVERSE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MASSIVERSE INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named DRAGONS VS ROBOTS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 10, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |