Drawing for THE SAINT WITHIN

USPTO serial 76690856

THE SAINT WITHIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SAINT WITHIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PRAYER CARDS, NAMELY, CARDS BEARING CALENDERS AND CARDS BEARING WORDS OF INSPIRATIONS; GREETING CARDSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2011MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Sep 20, 2011ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Sep 20, 2011IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
Aug 11, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 11, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 17, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 14, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 14, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 14, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 16, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 15, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 12, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 28, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 27, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 27, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 14, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 14, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 14, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 11, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 19, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 29, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 16, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 18, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance