USPTO serial 76690929
NK-92
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4154244Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 5, 2012
- Examiner
- LIWINSKI, HELENE AGNES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NK-92?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Cells for scientific, laboratory or medical research | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2017 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 2, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 17, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2011 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 2, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2011 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |