USPTO serial 76691031
BRAAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3765554Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2010
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BRAAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Guttenberg, NJ
Guttenberg, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Megha Bhouraskar
MEGHA BHOURASKAR Poppe & Bhouraskar, LLP350 5TH AVE STE 7315NEW YORK, NY 10118-7315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Bar and restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 8, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 18, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |