USPTO serial 76691390
CONFLICT DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 27, 2010
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONFLICT DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Conflict Dynamics International, Inc.
Cambridge, MA
Other trademarks owned by Conflict Dynamics International, Inc.
Conflict Dynamics International, Inc.
Cambridge, MA
Other trademarks owned by Conflict Dynamics International, Inc.
Conflict Dynamics International, Inc.
Cambridge, MA
Other trademarks owned by Conflict Dynamics International, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Ackerman
JAMES L. ACKERMAN Wadland & Ackerman2 DUNDEE PARK DR STE 304ANDOVER, MA 01810-3725UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Public policy research and consulting services in the fields of conflict prevention and conflict resolution between and within nations, development and implementation of strategies and policies to alleviate human suffering in conflict and crisis situations, and theoretical and practical aspects of international conflict resolutions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 19, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Conflict Dynamics International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Conflict Dynamics International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Conflict Dynamics International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CONFLICT DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |