Drawing for ELEVEN

USPTO serial 76691901

ELEVEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELEVEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara Z. Morrissey

BARBARA Z. MORRISSEY Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151-0099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Development of environmentally compliant chemical production methods which are free of lead, cadmium and mercury for the treatment of metals, semiconductor materials and polymers for galvanoplating, galvanizing baths, galvanizing preparations, tempering and soldering preparations, electroplating and electroless nickel platingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 5, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 5, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 18, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 14, 2009RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 14, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 31, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 31, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 9, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2008DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Oct 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2008TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Aug 27, 2008PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance