USPTO serial 76691901
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara Z. Morrissey
BARBARA Z. MORRISSEY Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151-0099UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Development of environmentally compliant chemical production methods which are free of lead, cadmium and mercury for the treatment of metals, semiconductor materials and polymers for galvanoplating, galvanizing baths, galvanizing preparations, tempering and soldering preparations, electroplating and electroless nickel plating | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 14, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |