USPTO serial 76691918
RIPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myron Amer
Myron Amer Galgano & Associates, PLLC20 W. Park Avenue, Suite 204Long Beach, NY 11561UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Fruit juice, and not including alcoholic beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |