USPTO serial 76692043
THE "ULTIMATE" PERSUADERS FEATURING RICHARD POINDEXTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE "ULTIMATE" PERSUADERS FEATURING RICHARD POINDEXTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DUANE HARLEY
DUANE HARLEY D. HARLEY, P.C.303 5TH AVE RM 1107NEW YORK, NY 10016-6601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT, NAMELY, LIVE MUSIC CONCERTS, COMPOSITION OF MUSIC FOR OTHERS, MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF RECORDING, PRODUCTION AND POST PRODUCTION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF MUSIC, VIDEO AND FILM, MUSIC PRODUCTION SERVICES | ABANDONED | Jul 26, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 28, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 28, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 28, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |