Drawing for Serial No. 76692183

USPTO serial 76692183

Serial No. 76692183

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IMAM, AMEEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76692183?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

MYRON AMER Myron Amer, P.C.350 NATIONAL BLVD STE 2BLONG BEACH, NY 11561-3327UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Rice flour, and not including foodstuff-modifying edible agentsACTIVEJun 1, 1978

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 27, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 27, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 27, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 4, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 3, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 9, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 2, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 29, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2009RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 5, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 10, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 25, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 25, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 25, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance