USPTO serial 76692195
RIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brentwood, TN
Brentwood, TN
Brentwood, TN
Brentwood, TN
Brentwood, TN
Brentwood, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Williams
JOHN P. WILLIAMS Tune, Entrekin & White, P.C.315 Deaderick StreetSuite 1700, Regions CenterNASHVILLE, TN 37238-1700Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | CONSULTATION SERVICES TO COMPANIES WITH PHYSICAL FACILITIES OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, NAMELY, INTERIOR DECORATION AND DESIGN SERVICES INTENDED TO ASSIST COMPANIES IN IMPROVING THEIR RETAIL IMAGES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Charles, Edsel
- Other trademarks owned by Charles, Edsel
- Other trademarks owned by Charles, Bonnie
- Other trademarks owned by Charles, Bonnie
- Other trademarks owned by Wright, Paula
- Other trademarks owned by Wright, Paula
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RIA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |