USPTO serial 76692250
HUMAN DYNAMICS INNOVATION IN EMPLOYEE COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4289209Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 12, 2013
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HUMAN DYNAMICS INNOVATION IN EMPLOYEE COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consulting services in the field of human resources providing feedback to management to identify and correct problems in the work environment thereby promoting employee engagement, productivity and retention through the use of an innovatively different Employee Survey evaluation of workplace behaviors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 10, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Martin, Rosemary M.
- Other trademarks owned by Martin, Rosemary M.
- Other trademarks owned by Martin, Rosemary M.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named HUMAN DYNAMICS INNOVATION IN EMPLOYEE COMMUNICATIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 5, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |