USPTO serial 76692281
MIRACLE BLENDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3921430Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 22, 2011
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MIRACLE BLENDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BRANTFORD, ONTARIO, CA
BRANTFORD, ONTARIO, CA
BRANTFORD, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard O. Bartz
RICHARD O. BARTZ BARTZ & BARTZ6950 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTHSUITE 119EDINA, MN 55435-1983Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ELECTRIC MIXERS, CHOPPERS, WHIPPERS, GRINDERS, GRATERS AND BLENDERS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | RFRR | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |