USPTO serial 76692309
PRAVION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRAVION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles M. Marmelstein
CHARLES M. MARMELSTEIN Arent Fox LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 400Washington, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Precision measuring apparatus, namely, laser measuring systems; electric distribution panels; radar apparatus; high-frequency apparatus, namely, electronic high-frequency transmitters, electronic high-frequency receivers, electronic high-frequency synthesizers, electronic high-frequency converters and high-frequency measuring devices, high-frequency switches, high-frequency switching power supplies, electronic frequency converters for high velocity electro motors, and high frequency converter for actuators; intercommunication apparatus, namely, wireless intercom and wired intercom, communication transmission devices, radio frequency identification devices, and multiplexers; electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations; data processors; computers; bar code readers; printed circuits; computer software for application and database integration; computer software for creating searchable databases of information and data; computer software for communicating with users of hand-held computers; computer software for controlling self-service terminals; computer software for wireless content delivery; computer software for the field of warehousing and distribution, to manage transactional data, provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports; computer software for controlling and managing patient medical information; downloadable computer firmware for electronics; software for monitoring and controlling communication between computers and automated machine systems; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of manuals in the field of electronics; electronic publications, namely, manuals featuring electronics recorded on computer media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |