USPTO serial 76692376
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon S. Lazarovitz
31 Westgate Blvd.Toronto, Ontario, M3H 1N8CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | on-line entertainment services offered over a global communications network featuring information relating to a television program series and motion picture films (based upon use in commerce); and entertainment services in the nature of on-going animated or live action television programs and production of motion picture films, all in the field of children's entertainment (based upon intent to use) | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |