USPTO serial 76692377
FRANNY'S FEET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4181129Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2012
- Examiner
- I, DAVID C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FRANNY'S FEET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, CA
HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, CA
HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq. Kenyon & Kenyon LLPOne BroadwayNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DHX MEDIA LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by DHX MEDIA LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by DHX MEDIA LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by DECODE ENTERTAINMENT INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named FRANNY'S FEET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |