USPTO serial 76692444
SKYLIGHT ECLIPSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKYLIGHT ECLIPSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Moses Lake, WA
Moses Lake, WA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Hard hats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2010 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |