USPTO serial 76692688
CITY CLUB RESIDENCES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LITZAU, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CITY CLUB RESIDENCES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NICOLE REKANT
NICOLE REKANT PARDO & GAINSBURG, LLP2 S BISCAYNE BLVDSTE 2475MIAMI, FL 33131-1809Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Real estate marketing services in the field of condominiums, apartments, and senior living | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CITYCLUB LIVING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CITYCLUB LIVING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by KAPITAL DEVELOPMENT, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CITY CLUB RESIDENCES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| May 3, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2010 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |