USPTO serial 76692841
21
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SERVANCE, RENEE L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 21?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip M. Weiss
Philip M. Weiss WEISS & WEISS410 Jericho Turnpike, Suite 105Jericho, NY 11753UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Lottery services; on-line lottery services; organization of lotteries; production and distribution of television shows and movies providing a restricted website featuring lottery game facts and information; entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of a game show; conducting and administering, for others, of periodic drawings and games of chance for awarding monetary and other prizes; providing entertainment in the nature of games sweepstakes; lotteries; entertainment services in the nature of games of chance; news and general entertainment information over communication networks, namely, providing news in the field of lotteries; gambling services; gaming services, namely, conducting and providing facilities for special events featuring gaming contests and tournaments; gambling and lottery services; television and radio program production; magazine publishing services; providing online entertainment in the nature of computer games; computer gaming contests; providing on line card games; gambling tournaments; betting pools; gambling services in the nature of numbers games; event wagering; casino tournaments; betting; wagering; video production; wagering data and information; gaming and gambling; providing a website featuring information and a database in the fields of poker; entertainment in the nature of lottery games and arranging and conducting lottery events | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |