USPTO serial 76692885
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Laval, Québec, H7L 4P8, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Jeffries
STEPHEN J. JEFFRIES HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP800 17TH STREET N.W., STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio receivers, DVD players, AM/FM stereos, AM/FM signal receivers, graphic equalizers, public address systems, karaoke machines; audio components, namely, audio speakers, portable audio speakers, loudspeakers, home theater speakers, subwoofers, multi-application audio speakers, indoor-outdoor audio speakers, computer speakers, automotive audio speakers and subwoofers, audio amplifiers, antennas, surge protectors, computer docking stations for use with audio speakers, electronic docking stations for portable audio devices in the nature of portable and handheld digital electronic devices for recording, organizing, transmitting, manipulating, and reviewing text, data and audio files, MP3 players and satellite radios; headphones; compact disk players, audiotape players and recorders, phonograph record players, radio tuners and receivers, stereo tuners and receivers, MP3 players and recorders, digital audio players and recorders; remote control units for audio or audio/video equipment, namely, remote control units for televisions, DVD players, stereo systems, home theater systems and compact disc players | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |