USPTO serial 76692888
CUIZEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4527333Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2014
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CUIZEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Laval, Québec, H7L 4P8, CA
Laval, Québec, H7L 4P8, CA
Laval, Québec, H7L 4P8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Jeffries
STEPHEN J. JEFFRIES HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP800 17TH ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-3906UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Kitchen ware in the nature of small electrical kitchen appliances, namely, electric mixers, electric knives, electric knife sharpeners, electric can openers, electric food blenders and electric food processors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Kitchen ware in the nature of small electrical kitchen appliances, namely, electric toasters, electric coffee makers, rotisseries, electric grills, microwave ovens, wine coolers being refrigerated cabinets containing racks for wine bottles, toaster ovens, electric cooking ovens, electric popcorn poppers and electric kettles, electric toasters, electric cookware, namely, broilers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 13, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 25, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |