USPTO serial 76692977
CLINTERACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLINTERACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M4V 1R2, CA
Toronto, Ontario M4V 1R2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Jeffrey
JOHN JEFFREY DENNISON ASSOCIATES133 Richmond Street West Suite 301Toronto, ON M5H 2L7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in collection and management of data collected in clinical trials of pharmaceutical products and biomedical devices, namely, a database for event tracking and reporting data management tools to collect, code and analyze results, and to help meet the reporting requirements and deadlines of regulatory agencies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Temporary use of non-downloadable software for collection and management of data collected in clinical trials of pharmaceutical products and biomedical devices, namely, a database for event tracking and reporting data management tools to collect, code, and analyze results, and to help meet reporting requirements and deadlines of regulatory agencies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |