Drawing for MARLIN OFFSHORE

USPTO serial 76693053

MARLIN OFFSHORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LATTUCA, FRANK J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARLIN OFFSHORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer S. Sickler

JENNIFER S. SICKLER GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1000 LOUISIANASUITE 3400HOUSTON, TX 77002-5007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Managing the exploration, production and operations of oil and gas properties for othersACTIVE—
037Offshore oil and gas drilling services; offshore oil and gas drilling contractor servicesACTIVE—
040Environmental remediation solutions for the oil and gas drilling industries, namely, soil treatment servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 12, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 28, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 27, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 12, 2010RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 11, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 12, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 7, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 4, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 23, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 19, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance