Drawing for REMO OUTDOORS

USPTO serial 76693093

REMO OUTDOORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REMO OUTDOORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LARRY F. GITLIN

LARRY F. GITLIN BEAUMONT GITLIN & TASHJIAN21650 OXNARD STREET, STE. 1620WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Musical drums and percussion instrumentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 3, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 2, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2011PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Feb 28, 2011PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Feb 28, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2011PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 14, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 7, 2011PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 21, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 20, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 20, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 19, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 10, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 3, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 11, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 9, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 8, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 1, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 30, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance