USPTO serial 76693254
JM JACOB MICHAEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JM JACOB MICHAEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | HANDBAGS OF LEATHER, SNAKESKIN AND COPPER | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |