USPTO serial 76693350
BEER PONG (BEIRUT)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEER PONG (BEIRUT)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary L. Shaffer
901 BANKS PLALEXANDRIA, VA 22312-5507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO GAMES IN THE FORM OF SOFTWARE SOLD IN THE FORM OF INTERNET-FACILITATED DOWNLOADS TO A MOBILE OR IMMOBILE DEVICE OR COMPUTER, OR IN ANY FIXED MEDIA, SUCH AS RECORDABLE DISCS, DVD'S. HANDHELD CONSOLES, CONSOLES, TELEPHONES, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS AND CHIPS; HANDHELD COMPUTER GAMES; SOFTWARE-FACILITATED BOARD GAMES; AND SOFTWARE ACTUATED VIDEO GAMES SOLD VIA THE INTERNET, VIA DIGITAL DISTRIBUTION OR THROUGH TRADITIONAL RETAIL STOREFRONTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |