USPTO serial 76693424
KENWOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ULRICH, NANCY G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KENWOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myron Amer
MYRON AMER MYRON AMER, P.C.350 NATIONAL BOULEVARDSUITE 2BLONG BEACH, NY 11561-3327Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PEST REPELLANTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2010 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| May 17, 2010 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2009 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |